I know it’s not the point, but one of the things which
annoyed me about the TV show Stranger Things was
that the music was wrong. All that John
Carpenter-esque analogue synth music was from the late-70s, not 1983, which is
when the show was set. It damaged the
credibility of the show for me, from the get go. It told me that the film-makers had a limited
knowledge of their period. It turned out
they weren’t even born in 1983.
I had the same problem with Atomic Blonde. We are told,
at the beginning, that this film is set in 1989, in the days leading to the
collapse of the Berlin Wall (we are also told that, if you want a film about the
celebrations surrounding the wall coming down, this isn’t that film); yet, in
its first few minutes, its soundtrack gives prominence to David Bowie’s Cat People (Putting Out Fire) and Peter
Schilling’s Major Tom, from 1982 and
1983 respectively. If you’re going to
create a year, and employ music as part of your mise en scène, at least choose music
from the right year. Is that really so difficult?
Remember the good old 1980s? No, it seems some people are a bit hazy about the details ... |
The film also has a very punk aesthetic, from the stencil
and spray-can titles to the Mohican-wearing extras in the crowd scenes. I’m happy to accept that this late-seventies
look was still a thing in Berlin in the late 80s, and the use of the Ministry
song Stigmata (albeit in a cover
version featuring Marilyn Manson) is perfectly in-keeping with that look. It’s also bang-on for the period. As is Depeche Mode’s Behind the Wheel. These are
the sounds that I associate with the wintery days of the late cold war.
Setting this film in that period, and right on the border
between East and West at a moment of crisis, at least makes this action movie
stand out from the crowd - As does director, David Leitch’s visual fingerprint,
which he first planted on John Wick
(2014), his (uncredited) directorial debut.
Here he features chilly 80s blue neons and stop-light reds. The night-time street scenes are bathed in
yellow and the nightclubs are livid with vivid greens and purples.
I'm just going to roll my stylish collar up here, to hide my face, so they can't tell it's me. I could be any statuesque blonde with elite martial arts skills. |
Ms. Theron, kicking ass and not bothering to take names. |
Theron is magnificent in these fight sequences, one can
barely imagine the amount of work she put into preparing for them. Now, I’m only too happy to see an action film
- a traditional male province - in which a woman gets to be the protagonist and
doesn’t need rescuing by a man. Such
films have been far too thin on the ground for far too long. And, with the empowerment women have finally been experiencing in Hollywood
this year, if it is not time for a female action lead now, then when? I was not unmindful of the fact that Theron’s
first fight takes place in a kitchen, and she takes out villains with
everything from a frying pan to a freezer door.
No one’s keeping this lady in the kitchen.
But, when we first meet her, she is lying naked in a
bath. We get to see this several
times. At one point, the camera pans,
penetratingly up her body as she slowly sticks a microphone wire to her Victoria’s
Secrets. Really? Is that really
necessary? Yes, Daniel Craig and Matt
Damon both had to get topless as, respectively, Bond and Bourne, to show off
their muscles and give their female fans something to drool over. But this is typically quite rare for the men
in action films - beyond the inevitable muscle flexing - yet it is typically
very common for the females in action films.
If we are to accept Theron as a protagonist, a woman who can cope for
herself in the cruel world, do we really need to see her being so vulnerable
and passive and naked? Is that an
essential part of her powerful woman persona?
See, John McClane tends to look like this at the end of his adventures ... Ms. Theron starts hers like this, naked, battered and bruised. Girl power, y'all! |
Anyway, back at the cunning plot, James McAvoy is having fun
playing against type. Those pretty blue
eyes of his could have ensured a lucrative career as romantic leads and naive
heroes but, instead, he plays far darker and more complex characters. Have you seen his turn in Filth (2013)? Having shaved his hair off for X-Men Apocalypse (2016), he left it off when
playing the fractured psychopath in Split
(2016). Here, with a few weeks’
growth, his ‘Sinead O’Connor hair’, scrubby beard and permanent cigarette-smoke-squint are
part of his disguise as the deep-under-cover English spy who may, or may not,
have gone rogue.
Put your feet up, Jimmers. This role isn't gonna tax you too much. |
When the unique action scenes, and spectacular visuals, are
out of the way, what we’re left with is a common-or-garden cold war spy film
and, just like every other cold war spy film, everyone is betraying everyone
else. There’s always a mole betraying
the other spies, and it’s always bleedin’ obvious who that mole is (to everyone
except the other spies, of course). It
would be nice, just once, to see a film where that is not the case; but this
isn’t that film.
Just so we're clear, gentlemen, I'm not Sharon Stone, this isn't my first barn dance, and I won't be uncrossing my legs. Okay? |
Dir: David Leitch
Script: Kurt Johnstadt (based on 'The Coldest City' by Anthony Johnson & Sam Hart
Cert: 15
Dur: 115 mins
Script: Kurt Johnstadt (based on 'The Coldest City' by Anthony Johnson & Sam Hart
Cert: 15
Dur: 115 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment