Is it me or is there a big hole in this plot? |
I don’t like writing negative
reviews. I really don’t. Getting a film made (especially in Britain) is
such a Herculean task that anyone who succeeds should be proclaimed a national
hero. But sometimes films simply aren’t worth the effort. Sometimes the only rational thought when
fleeing from the cinema auditorium is: Well,
that’s seven quid I’ll never get back.
Sometimes, even a critic like me,
the most loathsome of parasites infesting the gut of the entertainment
industry, will be moved to speak out in the interests of my fellow human animal. Sometimes I have to issue dire warnings. I know no one will listen, but still I must
do what I can. If I save just one
unwary soul, then my 87 minutes of suffering will not have been in vain.
Storage 24 is just The Old Dark House For Beginners. ‘The Old Dark House’, in case you don’t
recognise the phrase, is a very simple, very familiar film-making formula: First you gather together a group of
individuals in a claustrophobic location from which they can’t escape; Then you
kill them off one by one. It’s the root
source of most stalk ’n’ slash films and, as such, you’ve seen it re-worked a
thousand times. The only remaining
interest in this over-familiar formula lies in finding new locations, creating
sympathetic characters and killing them in crowd-pleasingly gruesome ways.
After
thirty interminable years of watching these films straining against the leash
of this tightly-constrained genre, twisting it, playing with it or just capitulating
to it … I have lost the ability to find these films even remotely
engaging. The only way a film-maker can
engage my interest in this hoary old cliché is by undermining it, as Scream (1996) did (before it too became
a worn-out, unwelcome embarrassment of a franchise) or, more recently, Tucker and Dale Vs Evil (2010) and Cabin in the Woods (2012).
See, I
really don’t give a shit what you did last summer. I spit on your lazy, prurient, right-wing
agenda and your real final
destination is my arse.
So, if the Token Black Guy is the hero and both the women are Blonde ... I guess that means the Old Wise Guy's gotta die first. Bugger. |
All of
which is by-way of my explaining that I can’t watch Storage 24 the way it’s target audience is expected to watch
it. I’m not part of the 16-24 urban
demographic that forms Noel Clarke’s fan-base.
I don’t have the careless amorality of the teenage horror-movie-nut. (In all honesty, I didn’t when I was one
myself, but that’s a different story). Therefore, I can only watch this film
with eyes that have seen it all done so many times before, so much better; because
I’m not a beginner.
The film is
based on a script written by Clarke, is produced by him and, of course, stars
him. Clarke is something of a one-man
film industry. Blessed by looking a good
ten years younger than he actually is (37), he radiates both intelligence and emotion
and this has made him stand out among his contemporary young black actors. But, almost from the beginning, he has not
been satisfied with merely performing other writers’ lines. In 2005 he arrived in the public
consciousness in the re-launched Doctor
Who TV show, (as Rose’ long-suffering boyfriend, Mickey) whilst, at the
same time, writing his first feature film, Kidulthood. This would be released a year later. Two years after that, he wrote, directed and
starred in its sequel, Adulthood, and
was awarded the BAFTA for ‘Rising Star’.
This year, Storage 24 is just one of three films he
has written and acted in. Clarke is
established. He will never be out of
work because he is too versatile and is too much in control of his career. Also, this movie notwithstanding, he’s too
good. I think I can understand why he
may have decided to make a horror film now.
Horrors are cheap to make, enjoy an unwaveringly loyal audience and have
long shelf-lives. When his 16-24s have
forgotten all about Kidulthood and 4,3,2,1 (his 2010 all-girl heist movie),
they will still be renting Storage 24,
or tuning in for it on late-night TV.
So, from a business point of view, it’s a good move, just not a good
movie. If this had been his first film,
I fear it would be his last.
So, if I make to the end of this tunnel ... I stand a good chance of getting out of this movie with my reputation intact? Worth a try. |
The credits
tell us that the story was by Clarke, then three other people have written the
script. I really struggle to see why it
took four people to write this … unless they were gathered around a table
arguing over which scenes from Alien
(1979) and Aliens (1986) they were
going to steal. Ultimately they
decided: All of them.
The
location here is not a gothic cathedral-like oil tanker floating through space
… It’s a cold, grey storage facility in London.
It’s about as photogenic as a neon-lit corridor with grey, unpainted
walls which, by strange coincidence, is exactly what it is. I would say it is a warren of corridors … But it’s clearly just one corridor shot from
several different directions to give the (not terribly convincing) impression
of a labyrinth. As locations go, it is
about as bland and unattractive as the people who find themselves trapped
within it.
Clarke
plays Charlie who is, frankly, a whinging bitch. No wonder his girlfriend, Shelley, has given
him the elbow. To his credit, Clarke takes
the central role well, making Charlie really unlikeable in the early scenes and
a convincing if unwilling leader in the later ones. He is even responsible for the films scarce
flashes of humour. Why is he in the
titular storage warehouse? Well, Shelley
has apparently dumped all of their possessions there, which results in her and
Charlie being there at the same time. Or
something. This contrivance to get them
together isn’t dwelt upon, but together they are, sulky Charlie and obnoxious
Shelley along with her annoying and eminently killable friends.
Charlie’s
friend, Mark (Colin O'Donoghue) roams through this all with casual ease,
reminding me of no-one so much as Michael Fassbender (although that may have
been simply his accent). Based on this evidence,
I suspect that Mr. O’Donoghue may enjoy a good career playing roles the now
stratospherically-successful Fassbender turns down or is too expensive for!
What's the use of worrying ... We know who's going to die ... |
So anyway,
a ‘plane’ has crashed off-screen and a monster from its cargo hold is let loose
in the storage facility and the wiring has fused so the doors won’t open and
the lights keep going off. Classic Dark
House type stuff, really. But the
location is so visually dull and the characters so irritating (oh look, now
that one is going wandering off by themselves … in the dark) that you very
quickly find yourself rooting for the monster in the hope that it will simply
kill them all and bring the damn film to an early end.
But even
that brings with it problems, because every moment of so-called suspense is
undermined by a) lasting far, far, far too long and b) containing endlessly
repetitive close-ups of rolling, staring eyeballs and c) being ripped raw and
bleeding from Alien or Aliens (with one inevitable moment
lifted from Jaws). Literally every stalk and slash scene in here is
about as familiar and as welcome as an opera-singing insurance salesman. Every plot contrivance is telegraphed ages in advance ("You must be the only person in the world who still uses matches") even by overly-familiar-horribly-derivative-no-mobile-phone-signal horror-movie standards.
They’ve
spent some money on their monster, mind … Mixing CGI with practical
effects. Problem is, when you see it, it
looks like two parts alien Prawn to one-part Brundlefly. As with every other element of this movie,
it’s just too bloody familiar.
I made it ... I'm out! |
Sadly, the one or two gooey
on-screen deaths it is responsible for will, I suspect, be enough to give this
film an eager and enthusiastic audience of horror film newbies. But, if you’ve ever seen a good stalk ’n’ slash or Old Dark House
movie before, you’ve as good as already seen this one, so keep your money in
your pocket.
So few films are made in Britain
these days that is little shy of a crime when someone successfully gets one
made and it adds nothing to the sum total of knowledge or entertainment in the
world.
Storage 24 lacks pace, focus, motivation, tension and internal
logic but, other than that, it’s predictable, charmless and contrived. And ugly.
And boring.
No comments:
Post a Comment